Alinea (February 2012)

(Alinea exterior: taken from Yelp)

Chef Grant Achatz started Alinea in 2005. The restaurant has received 3 Michelin Stars in each edition of the Chicago Michelin Guide. It is located in the Lincoln Park neighborhood—roughly ½  mile from Charlie Trotter’s—and therefore is invariably borne out of the geographic and conceptual climate of Charlie Trotter’s. Both restaurants do not have any prominent signage, and with each there is a contrast between the relatively anonymous exterior and the originality of the experience offered within.

Arriving 15 minutes early for our 6:15 reservation, we checked in our umbrellas with the hostess and were led to our table upstairs. Shortly thereafter, we were introduced to the captain and selected still water. Interestingly, there were no female members of the wait staff. There is no menu option since everyone is served the same 20 course menu. Prior to the beginning of the meal, we requested a signed copy of the menu and were told that Chef Achatz was at Next for the evening, but that if we provided our addresses they would be happy to mail us a signed menu. When the signed menu arrived in the mail, it included our allergy substitution—very thoughtful.

On the table sat a “centerpiece,” a giant clear crystalline structure with a purple liquid inside. This was the first of 3 different centerpieces that would rest atop the table during the meal, each incorporated into courses within the menu. The centerpieces were very distracting and force one to divide their attention between the course in front of them and the sculptural object also residing atop the table—similar to paintings by Pieter Bruegel or films by Orson Welles in which the image contains relevant material at the limits of the frame. I appreciated the way in which the centerpieces exposed the way in which one’s attention is typically hierarchically organized such that one primarily notices only the dish in front of them. Each of the them was also visually striking, promoting a sense of wonder not often manifested in restaurants and demonstrating the way in which the restaurant’s value is not only found in the food but through the intermodal atmosphere it constructs.

The first proper course was titled “char roe,” and consisted of char roe sitting in a pool of pumpkin curry and shaved coconut. The orange color of the roe rhymed with the pumpkin curry and both the bright color and briny intensity of the roe awakened the palate. Very shortly thereafter, we were presented with a log topped with seaweed, on which sat the next four courses.

The first of the tastes consisted of an oyster filled with a sugary leaf. The king crab was filled with passion fruit and heart of palm, the mussel was filled with chorizo and saffron, and the razor clam contained carrot, soy, and daikon. The quartet introduced how the menu structure places signature Alinea dishes  (e.g. hot potato, cold potato) alongside iconic flavors from other cuisines. It was interesting to discern how much the ‘Alinea classics’ borrowed from other cuisines,  and how foreign/ethnic flavors had been adjusted to fit within the Alinea menu.

After the quartet of seafood bites were cleared, a new centerpiece was delivered: a lava lamp housing a bubbling tan-colored liquid. It would rest on the table for the next two courses. The food runner prefaced its delivery by saying that they “could have burned down the kitchen with the lava lamp” but decided to serve it as part of the meal instead. I found the joke to be candid to the point that I impulsively questioned whether he was being sarcastic. I then asked him whether the joke was scripted, to which he assured us that it was not. I believe that the joke reflects the difficulty that the servers have in relating to the food (and the highly unusual vessels that contain it). It is undeniably difficult to relate to serving a lava lamp, but the profoundly unfunny joke threatened to frame the overall experience as silly. The servers’ difficulty in genuinely interacting with the cuisine suggests to me that Alinea should break from a traditional delivery system. The dilemma is similar to a filmmaker attempting to organize the relationship between the images and the soundtrack or a playwright or novelist’s quest to arrive at appropriate punctuation and chapters. In order to eliminate the dissonance between the server and the cuisine, I feel that the chef would ideally present the cuisine himself, establishing a transparent unity between the food item’s delivery and its conception. Knowing that it would be impossible for the chefs to also act as servers, I think that it would be most appropriate for the servers to assume an identity similar to a stagehand during a theatrical performance, acting as a serious, ‘invisible’ presence (while it wouldn’t be appropriate for Alinea to copy Moto, I found that the earpieces that the servers wear at Moto really solve this dilemma and integrate the servers with the kitchen and the cuisine). At any rate, for a restaurant that takes its name from a diacritical mark, I find it ironic that it does not seem to have assembled the appropriate “culinary punctuation.”

After the delivery of the lava lamp, we was instructed to consume the first centerpiece. They informed us that the purple liquid inside of the crystalline structure was in fact beet juice (similar to chilled borscht) contained within a test tube. While beet juice is appropriately “sophisticated,” much of the course’s value rested both in the synaesthetic effect of “tasting color” and the sculptural quality of the crystalline centerpiece that housed it, which established a novel rupture between the dish and its natural referent.

Following the borscht, we were given a long pointed needle, on top of which rested an amalgamation of wooly pig, squid, fennel, and orange. The constituent flavors integrated nicely, but (similar to the beet juice) the affectivity of the course depended on its unusual serving vessel. The sharp needle structure attached a piercing quality that may not have resonated had the course been served on a plate. In a meal subsumed with the interplay between various sensory perceptions, I actually found this course utilized a haptic dimension quite unusual to fine-dining restaurants.

At this point of the meal, the lava lamp centerpiece was activated. We were presented with a large white bowl filled with a sous-vided fillet of tilefish (the tilefish was an allergy substitution for our scallop allergy). The server removed the top of the lava lamp and poured the liquid into the bowl. The broth consisted of dashi, an Asian stock consisting of kelp and bonito. With this course, Chef Achatz attempted to take seafood and render it similar in consistency to tofu. I admired the dish conceptually but was also not fond of the marshmallow consistency, which had basically drained the fish of its flavor.

Following the tilefish, we were presented with the meal’s lone family-style offering, a whole daurade served with an olive taponade, an eggplant caponata, and crispy puffed bread. Additionally, it was paired with a pear and apple soda. This course was influenced by Achatz’s travels along the Mediterranean. However, he does not casually reference a foreign cuisine; by serving the fish with its traditional accompaniments and in the grand scale with which it is enjoyed in Greece, Achatz acknowledges the way in which the dish is socially constituted in its native culture. It was another example of how the meal’s structure is  filled with courses associated with a number of different cuisines; much of its value stemmed from the contextual interplay between dishes that Achatz had conceived and time-honored dishes associated with various cultures.

After consuming the entire daurade, we then received a brief delay, after which we were brought a signature Alinea dish: Pheasant, apple, shallot, burning leaves. The burning leaves are tied to a stem that acts as the skewer, on the bottom of which rest an amalgamation of pheasant, apple, and shallot. This course utilized the earthy scent of the smoke, although we both found the smoke to overwhelm the pheasant and deprive it of its flavor. After the Greek family-style course, this “dish” represented a return to dishes that classic Achatz creations.

The following course represented another Alinea signature through its serving vessel: titled “Wild Mushrooms, juniper, pine, shallot,” the plate rested atop a juniper-scented pillow that deflated while we ate, releasing its pungent scent. Mushrooms are among my favorite foods and the dish featured a few different varieties: hen of the woods, hon shimeji, and black trumpet. However, I found that the taste of the mushrooms was overwhelmed by the juniper scent, producing dissonance rather than a dynamically supportive relationship.

At this point the third centerpiece arrived, a duo of purple flags. I suppose that a joke could have been made about the flags representing a gastronomic ‘coat of arms,’ but thankfully the server resisted such ‘humor.’ Continuing with Alinea’s most famous preparations, we were next presented with “Hot Potato, Cold Potato.” Described by the runner as their “most time-sensitive dish,” we were then instructed to slide the pin, which let the black truffle and potato drop into a buttery sauce. Anticipating a complex interplay between hot and cold temperatures, my expectation was not met as I found the cold potato to overwhelm the lukewarm sauce. However, I likely would have enjoyed the dish more if the title had not created the expectation for a strong temperature contrast.

Finally, the centerpiece was utilized, and the server informed us that the flags were in fact red cabbage. We were then instructed to assemble the flags’ handles to form a tent, on which I would fashion my own wrap. A plate was then presented containing the wrap’s ingredients: venison, paprika, mustard, and beer sauce—a Hungarian Ghoulash. Using red cabbage as the basis for a wrap would be overwhelming for many palates (and my companion found it overly intense) but I love sour flavors—“acidic” is a good characterization of both my palate and my soul. This dish represented yet another example of the way in which the originality of Alinea lies not just in the flavor combinations but more so, in the contexts in which they are employed.

The following course represented Alinea’s most famous dish, the “Black Truffle Explosion”: a single raviolo filled with liquefied black truffle and truffle oil, with a slice of romaine and parmesan on top. It is served resting atop a spoon in Alinea’s famous “anti-plate,” a shallow bowl without a bottom. This single bite contains a full 509 calories (almost as many as a Big Mac). We were instructed to consume it in one bite so as to avoid a mess. Eating it in one bite also maximizes its impact and promotes a sense of awe as to how such an intense flavor can be contained within a single bite. While raving about its rich earthiness with the server, we were informed that the dish dated back to Achatz’s pre-Alinea experience at Trio. We even had a second helping, although no manner how many times it is eaten it represents a combination of being both ephemeral and eminently memorable.

After round two of the Black Truffle Explosion was cleared, the table was sprayed and wiped with black tea perfume. While the black tea scent no doubt was chosen to compliment the upcoming dish, I believe that it was the olfactory equivalent of a palate cleanser—necessary after the pungency of the course that had just ended. A series of spoons was then placed on the table, each containing a bite’s worth of a single ingredient. The course is titled “Squab: Inspired by Miro,” and when viewed overhead references a painting by Miro that incorporated melting spoons. While the reference to a famous painter could be construed as name-dropping, I felt that this capability was averted by the way in which it adopted the ideology of Miro’s aesthetic. His abstract compositions are largely defined by an overwhelming contingency and the lack of a central object, and this course similarly forced the diner to forge their own sequence of consumption. We began with the squab and then proceeded to the fig, foie gras, celery root, picholine olive, duck fat with vinegar, lavender noodle and yellow plum.

Following the squab dish, we were given the smallest course of the night, consisting of five bites of ginger, each attached to a needle. This presentation relied upon the contrast between the miniscule size of each of the bites and the intensity of the ginger flavor. While the ginger was certainly aggressive, the size of each bite was overly small to distinguish one taste from the other. Given its placement on the menu, I believe that the kitchen preyed on the diner’s expectation for a palate cleanser. However, while this course would ostensibly represent an intermission between the savory courses and the desserts, the ginger was way too intense to soothe the palate. While the taste was not especially pleasant, since much of the restaurant’s virtue lies in confounding expectations the course was not out of line with the narrative of the experience.

Representing the first dessert course, the next dish was entitled “Winter in New Hampshire,” a reference to the sous-chef’s childhood roots. It was presented on an elaborate bonsai-like structure, and replicated an archetypal winter scene. The snow was formed through peppermint and liquid nitrogen, and it was served with a series of bites, including a persimmon candy and a honey pate de fruit. Resting on top of a tree stump rested a sidecar of distilled chocolate. Knowing that the last of the dessert courses represented one of the largest courses of the meal, neither of us were expecting to receive such a large course at this point, although the iconicity of the spectacle justified its large size—it relied upon the cultural romance of peppermint as an embodiment of winter nostalgia. This course was a prime example of the way in which Alinea—similar to the Next Childhood Menu—endeavors to situate cultural iconicity within the realm of gastronomy.

For the second dessert course we were presented with torched cinnamon, which acted as a skewer. On top of the cinnamon ‘handle’ rested tempura battered Anju pear and brie cheese—a variation of a cheese course. Similar to a number of courses throughout the meal, I was overwhelmed by the intensity of the flavors, the ingenuity of the serving device, and the complex sensory interplay.

The penultimate course arrived in the form of a balloon. The food runner did look somewhat comical carrying a balloon, and this course was another instance in which I sensed a disjunction between the cuisine and the (otherwise very chic) person delivering it. The balloon was sour apple-flavored and dissolved rapidly; we were instructed to consume it quickly. The flavor profile was somewhat infantile and reminiscent of a childish taffy candy. It was an additional example in which the group of flavors would have been off-putting and even egregious within another context, but appropriate given the balloon structure’s coherence in a menu whereby each of the courses is largely distinguished by its sculptural materiality.

For the last of the meal’s roughly 20 courses, the sous chef emerged from the kitchen to prepare it tableside. Through its grand scope, this was a sort of parallel to the family-style daurade. One of the servers unrolled a mat on the table and then placed an enormous dark chocolate hollow egg on the table. Pollock-style, the sous chef then  splashed a series of syrups on the mat including a butternut squash reduction, Goose Island Caramel Stout, and lingonberry syrup. He then threw the egg onto the table where it smashed like a piñata, spilling its contents: we were able to discern a number of tastes, including a fruit roll up, cotton candy, pretzels, licorice, and a Butterfinger-like candy. The tableside presentation reflected a unity between conception and presentation that had been absent in the previous courses. Moreover, the shattering of the giant egg was playfully violent, and a shard of dark chocolate landed on my jacket. The abstract dimensions of the dessert exposed the way in which plates are typically orchestrated in the fixed dimensions of a plate structure.  It represented a dish that was highly organized yet without relying on a fixed center—an appropriate metaphor for the restaurant itself.

Following the meal, we requested a tour of the kitchen. It was larger than either Next or Charlie Trotter’s, and is famous for the fact that it is carpeted and for the absence of a large stove, which characterizes the avant-garde sensibility of the kitchen and distances the restaurant from the romance of the flame.

Alinea’s wide acclaim would suggest that its food is among the best tasting in the country. While this is no doubt true, the restaurant’s affective resonance results from destabilizing taste as the privileged sensory perception. The dishes rely upon the dynamic relationship between taste, image, sound, scent, and touch; the resultant heterogeneity constitutes an envelope structure: overwhelming, experiential, and environmental. The lack of medium specificity and global, socially democratic references characterize Alinea as a great example of a shift in gastronomy from the realm of upper-class servant culture to an interplay involving various culinary discourses. Certainly, a meal Alinea is not only singularly memorable but influences future dining experiences.

Next: Childhood

(This is a review of the Childhood menu from this past winter)

Perhaps the most difficult ticket to come by in the country, Next is the latest venture by Grant Achatz. The restaurant changes its theme every 3 months, and the Childhood iteration lasted from late fall to early winter. The Childhood concept is really the perfect metaphor for Next’s reservation process; after being lucky enough to secure tickets I felt as though I had un-wrapped the golden ticket from a candy bar. The price for our tickets was only $80 each—quite expensive by most standards, but an absolute bargain given the quality of most of the ingredients and the nine course menu. The price point corresponds to the time of the reservation, and the price escalates until the 8:00 seating, which is $170, and works its way back down to $80 for the final seating of the night at 10:30. The number of courses remains the same regardless of the seating time, and I note this because it seems to me that the more pricey seatings help cover the costs of the more inexpensive tables. I don’t see how the restaurant makes a profit on the $80 seatings, especially given that my companion and I opted for no beverage pairings.

Finding Next was difficult as it is almost completely unmarked, with only a small, faded glowing sign bearing its name. It certainly makes no effort to assimilate within the West End neighborhood. The lack of signage metaphorizes the restaurant’s lack of a stable identity—given that every three months Next morphs into a new restaurant, how do you represent it with a sign or insignia? Shortly before arriving at Next we passed The Publican (one of Paul Kahan’s three ventures), and the contrast between The Publican’s jubilant communality and Next’s nondescript appearance is quite striking. Nevertheless, we arrived undeterred and upon entering I presented our ticket to the hostess, who led us to a wonderful two-top near the center of the surprisingly small dining room.

Shortly after being seated, we were greeted by one of a number of servers. Given that there is a set menu with allergies noted with the reservation, there are no captains but instead only food runners (there is a manager/sommelier, however.) After having our decision for no beverage pairings confirmed and stating that we had no applicable allergies, we were presented with the first course. Titled PB&J, it would arrive gift-wrapped in a small box, with the instruction to down it in one bite and not to shake it. The server also indicated that this course was meant to capture the sense of surprise characteristic of childhood. I found this description to be unnecessary and somewhat disingenuous, since Next marketed itself quite transparently and publicly revealed their menu through social media over a month prior. While one could argue that I made a conscious decision to look at the menu release prior to experiencing the menu in person, it was the restaurant’s decision to release the menu beforehand and they had to expect that diners would read and view the menu items online. Furthermore, such a description implies that surprise is absent in the realm of fine dining, which is simply untrue. Most fine dining experiences are filled with nuggets of surprise, such as the amuse bouche trio I enjoyed at Everest or the foie gras truffle amuse at Ria. Surprise also relates to the unusual, daring flavor pairings exhibited by fine dining restaurants such as Charlie Trotter’s or Hugo’s. Given that I was previously familiar with every menu item, there was actually significantly less surprise in my experience at Next than at most of my experiences dining out. Indeed, the PB&J arrived precisely as described in their menu release (and described in numerous blogs and reviews): a tempura crisp filled with liquefied peanut butter and pomegranate jelly. I greatly admired this course for its elevation of a food item not generally associated with fine dining. The concept was successful for two interrelated reasons: it tasted excellent, and the quality of ingredients was superb. I feel as though elevating ‘childhood’ food items works if the ingredients and textures are on the level of fine-dining, and the use of liquid peanut butter and pomegranate jelly certainly sufficed. That said, I do feel that the element of surprise could be enhanced by altering the ingredients; for example, perhaps the type of jelly should alternate every night. However, given the excellent taste and the fact that the bite was really sized as a palate cleanser and not a proper course, I was very satisfied with the opening bite.

After our first courses were cleared, the table was crumbed by one of the servers, a young woman perhaps no older than me. The vast majority of servers were quite young, and while I suppose this held some corollary with the childhood menu theme, it was very unusual for a fine dining restaurant. Nevertheless, the service was meticulous and thorough, on a par with other fine dining establishments. It was necessary to crumb the table in between each courses given the messiness of the courses (many of which involved crumbs and spillage of ingredients.) While the untidiness might irritate some diners, I found it perfectly acceptable given that the staff rose to the crumbing challenge.

Our second course was a chicken soup with shallots, carrots, celery leaves, a hot piece of butter and chicken in the shape of a noodle. The broth was poured tableside and the butter dissolved in the liquid. I delighted in the manner in which the dish literally assumed shape in front of me, with the mass of butter dissolving upon contact with the hot broth. We both greatly enjoyed this course, no surprise given that I love soups in general. I admire the manner in which Next mediates the childhood theme of the courses with providing a course progression that mirrors that of an extended tasting menu. If the PB&J constituted a canapé, the soup represented a proper first course. Not all rules are meant to be broken, apparently…

The third course of the evening would represent a fish item with which I was largely unfamiliar: titled Fish-N-Chips, the dish would feature a raw, roughly 2 ounce piece of Walleye Pike, at the center of a plating preparation that was described on the menu as “drawn by a child.” The pike was enclosed by malt vinegar foam, with cucumber slices representing waves of water, potato sticks serving as the net, meyer lemon representing the sun, a stick figure drawn from balsamic vinegar coulis and crushed tempura emblematic of the sandy shore. Similar to a number of courses throughout the evening, I was completely unaware of how to consume the dish, and surrendered myself to the fact that there truly were no wrong answers. I actually indulged my indecision regarding the consumption of the dishes throughout the dinner, and the different taste combinations associated with explorations in combining the various ingredients constituted perhaps the greatest element of surprise of the meal.

With the fish dish consumed, course four represented perhaps the most iconic dish of childhood, Mac and Cheese. I was ambivalent about this dish as I generally don’t consume mac and cheese, but I found the dish’s inclusion in the menu justified by the use of high quality ingredients. I was fortunate in that the cheese used was Manchego, which happens to be my favorite cheese. Accompanying the noodles and sauce were an array of items paired with mac and cheese in varying parts of the country, including hot dog, blue cheese, bread crumbs, and diced apples. Upon delivery, the server stated that he was “always a hot dog person”—an innocuous statement, but clearly staged in its use of the first person singular.

After a modest wait of roughly 10 minutes, we were presented with a dish that we smelled before even seeing it. Incredibly pungent with the scent of burning hay, the dish was titled “Autumn Scene: a walk through a Michigan forest,” and was culled from Achatz’s walks through the forest as a child. The plating of the dish was very Alinea-esque in its sculptural emphasis (served on a log) and collage of ingredients. On top of the log but underneath a glass plate on top of which rested the edible components of the dish were leaves, hay, and dehydrated fruits. Resting atop the glass plate were a mushroom puree, blue corn polenta, maitake and matsutake mushrooms, swiss chard, broccoli, carrots, berries and fried leeks.

While waiting for course six, my companion went to the bathroom, at which point I listened to the neighboring table receive one of their non-alcoholic beverage pairings. The server delivered lemonade, describing it as a “kids’ drink that I think has the potential to be an adult drink.” Similar to the description of the hot dog, I did find the use of the “I” voice to be somewhat phony since I have no doubt that he had been told to use this line. This delivery demonstrates Next’s attempt to stage spontaneity, and while I admire the attempt I do feel as though this is an impossible feat given Next’s transparent marketing through social media.

Course six would arrive as the final savory course and arguably the best dish of the night. Titled “Hamburger,” what arrived was in fact a piece of sous-vide short rib with caramelized onions, fried mushrooms, ketchup, mustard, an almost liquid bun with sesame seeds, dried cornichons (pickles), and mayonnaise. I was somewhat defensive regarding the attempt to elevate a fast-food staple given that I am passionate about fast food. However, this dish was out of the ordinary to the extent that it clearly made no attempt to supplant the fast food burger. Rarely a fan of short rib as I find it too fatty and akin to pot roast and other ‘poverty meats’ in texture I was fonder of the accompaniments than the meat itself. Given the multitude of sauces (and the bun itself, which was closer to a sauce in texture than an actual bun) I feel as though Achatz designed the dish partly in order to expose the way in which fast food items are ordered largely for their sauces—as in the legacy of the Big Mac ‘super sauce,’ or Arbys’ famous sauces, for example. In addition to fast food, sauces are especially prevalent in the realm of fine dining, and I also admired this course (as well as many of the others) for exposing how through their shared emphasis on sauce fast food and fine dining are perhaps not as dissimilar as one would believe.

The seventh course represented something of a mystery to me; it was perhaps a vehicle for the prop more than an attempt to provide a coherent food item. This was a shame since after 6 courses we both agreed that the meal was one of the best we had ever consumed. For the 7th course, we were each presented with vintage Star Trek lunch boxes filled with a nutella snack pack, wagyu jerky, apple-brandy fruit leather, a truffled oreo, homemade funyun and a mixed berry drink spiked with Cabernet. This course did not work for me since it was an excessively aggressive mix of savory with sweet. The wagyu jerky simply should not have been consumed alongside the sweet nutella pudding and the oreo, and the course lacked any sort of consistency. This was the first course that really did not belong on a tasting menu—eating salts and sweets in quick succession works when one is in elementary school and attempting to eat quickly so as to begin running around on the playground. However, dining in a restaurant means a heightened analysis of the food itself, which exposed the lack of harmony between the ingredients.

Most likely representing a palate cleanser through its placement as the 7th course, the next dessert was presented as “Foie’Sting and Donuts,” consisting of two apple cider-flavored donut holes paired with a beater dunked in foie gras-flavored frosting. While this dish clearly referenced licking cookie dough off a beater (a practice common in childhood) I felt that this dish was a play on the coffee and donuts dessert course at French Laundry, where Achatz worked in the past. In this manner, the menu at Next is not only a remembrance of childhood food experiences but also a veiled commentary on past dishes associated with Achatz’s background in fine dining. Instructed to dip one’s hands in the frosting, we were presented with moist towels for drying our hands, a service that perhaps would have been appreciated following the messy PB&J course.

The centerpiece of the dessert menu, course 8 was impressively presented on a slate topped with sweet potatoes that were lit on fire. In addition to the slate, we were each given a plate with apples, oatmeal, rum ice cream, and marshmallow. After the fire was extinguished, we divided the sweet potatoes and mixed them with the other ingredients. Neither of us was fond of the burnt sweet potato, especially since two nights prior we had enjoyed a delicious sweet potato dessert at Boka (it was not lit on fire.) This dish reminded me of the cuisine at TRU—a course that I admired in concept but disagreeable in taste. Although taste is arbitrary, I do find it difficult to believe that one could find value in burnt sweet potato—it not only did not taste good but also smelled rotten and looked unappealing (after the fire was finished, of course.) Additionally, while I enjoyed the ice cream and apple crisp-like accompaniments, I found the combination incoherent and more like three separate desserts.

The final course was listed on the menu listed simply as “Hot Cocoa.” Unfortunately, it really tasted no different from Swiss Miss. It’s interesting to me that restaurants go to painstaking lengths in devising the main dishes, yet the final taste—usually mignardises but in this case hot cocoa—are so often generic. Upon completion of the meal, we were graciously presented with a tour of the kitchen—a very nice gesture. I always find value in contrasts—I find that they reward complex analysis in texts, and the kitchen tour was no exception. I enjoyed the way the childhood theme of the menu was counteracted by the seriousness and precision exhibited by the small army of cooks.

Overall, I was satisfied with the experience. We both agreed that the first 6 courses were superior to the dessert courses, perhaps due to the fact that the savory dishes (with the exception of the Autumn Scene course) represented iconic childhood dishes while the desserts were more improvised. I feel as though the Childhood menu commentates more on fine dining than on childhood, perhaps due to the fact that I was fortunate enough to be raised on less generic food than Kraft mac and cheese or pb&j sandwiches. Through the emphasis on surprise, the meal ascribed value and relevance to food items associated with childhood. I particularly enjoyed the project of staging a tasting menu (thereby operating from the vantage point of fine dining) filled with food items associated with childhood. The menu mediates, and almost synthesizes, two apparently irreconcilable fields of cuisine. I do believe that the courses referenced not only childhood staples but also items from The French Laundry, such as the PB&J (similar to the gruyere puffs at TFL) or the donut dessert (similar to the donuts at TFL.) Given Achatz’s background as both child and fine dining chef, the menu therefore represents his biography told through food. As such, I do wonder whether the focus of reliving childish surprise is oversold, and feel that the experience is best framed as a synthesis between family and haute cuisine.